Sapience
Customer stories
SpecFunnel

SpecFunnel earns replies from 1 in 3 ENR 400 conversations with Sapience

SpecFunnel sells ITP and quality-evidence tracking to large construction contractors — a market so concentrated that the ENR 400 ranking of top US contractors effectively is the addressable list. Sapience ran a five-week LinkedIn campaign into it: 433 connection requests, 84 accepted, 63 conversations opened, 20 replies at a 31.7% reply rate, and 11 leads auto-tagged interested.

Company overview

Most outbound advice assumes an infinite list: burn a thousand leads learning, the market will not notice. SpecFunnel does not have that luxury. It sells quality-evidence tracking to large general contractors, and the ENR 400 — the industry's own ranking of the top US contractors — is close to a census of every account that matters.

Burn that list with spam and there is no second list.

So the campaign had to be built like the asset it was targeting: named accounts with existing relationships excluded from the send before it started, sequences that engaged before they asked, and every reply tagged and triaged so no interested contractor waited on an answer.

Five weeks later, a third of the conversations it opened had replies in them.

Results

Reply rate on conversations opened
31.7% · 20 of 63 messaged
Connection requests into the ENR 400
433 · five-week campaign
Leads auto-tagged interested
11 · 55% of tagged replies
Connections accepted
84 · 19.4% acceptance

Company

Industry
Construction software
Engagement
LinkedIn outbound
Audience
ENR 400 contractors
Started
June 2026

Challenge

Construction quality software is a nine-figure problem sold into a four-hundred-account market. The people who buy it — quality and project leadership at major contractors — sit under a daily layer of vendor connection requests, and they talk to each other.

That changes the arithmetic of outbound entirely. When the whole market fits in one campaign, reply rate is not a vanity metric; it is a measure of how much of the market is still warm. A 2% reply blast into the ENR 400 would reach everyone once and be finished as a channel.

There was also a relationships problem going in: SpecFunnel already knew people at some of these firms, and an automated invite landing on an account mid-relationship reads worse than silence. The send list had to be edited by name, not just by filter, before the first message went out.

Solution

The campaign ran in HeyReach against the ENR 400, with the named accounts SpecFunnel was already talking to excluded from the audience before launch — the send list existed in two versions, and the smaller one is the one that ran.

The sequence was built to be seen before it asked. Alongside 433 connection requests, it ran 384 profile views and 375 post engagements, so the name on the invite had already appeared in the prospect's notifications doing something other than selling. Acceptance came in at 19.4% — earned attention in a feed where most vendor invites are declined on sight.

Every reply was auto-tagged as it landed, splitting interested from not, so follow-up effort went to the eleven conversations that wanted it rather than evenly across twenty. The distinction is HeyReach's tagging, read straight from the reporting API — the same numbers this page is built on.

The ENR 400 campaign, top to bottom
Connection requests sent433
Connections accepted84
Conversations opened63
Replies received20
Auto-tagged interested11
View as table
Campaign funnel, SpecFunnel × ENR 400, Jun–Jul 2026
StageLeads
Connection requests sent433
Connections accepted84
Conversations opened63
Replies received20
Auto-tagged interested11

Lifetime campaign totals read from the HeyReach reporting API on 19 Aug 2026. Interested leads are HeyReach's automatic reply tagging, not our judgement.

Results

Five weeks of sending: 433 connection requests, 84 accepted, 63 conversations opened, 20 replies. That is a 31.7% reply rate on conversations opened — the number that says the messaging matched the market — and 11 of the 20 tagged replies were tagged interested.

Eleven interested leads is a small number in most markets. Inside a 400-account universe it is coverage: these are named contractors from the industry's own top-of-market list, in live conversation with a product built for exactly their compliance problem.

And the list survived the campaign. No burned segment, no spam reports ending the channel — the asset is intact for the second wave.

  • 20 replies from 63 conversations opened — a 31.7% reply rate
  • 11 leads auto-tagged interested, 55% of all tagged replies
  • 433 invites, 84 connections, at a 19.4% acceptance rate
  • 384 profile views and 375 post engagements ran ahead of the asks
433 invites into the ENR 400, 84 connections, 20 replies at a 31.7% reply rate, and 11 leads tagged interested — with the named accounts SpecFunnel already knew excluded before the first send.
SpecFunnel · Jun–Jul 2026

Looking ahead

A follow-on campaign with 494 leads sits loaded and pending on the same system, and a conference-attendee campaign is drafted beside it. The first wave's segment-by-segment reply data decides what those sequences say — which is the difference between running outbound twice and running it better the second time.

Results

Reply rate on conversations opened
31.7% · 20 of 63 messaged
Connection requests into the ENR 400
433 · five-week campaign
Leads auto-tagged interested
11 · 55% of tagged replies
Connections accepted
84 · 19.4% acceptance

Company

Industry
Construction software
Engagement
LinkedIn outbound
Audience
ENR 400 contractors
Started
June 2026